Mayor Bob Weinstein of Ketchikan, Alaska and Maddow

flickr/creativecommons/stefan elf
Listen: Maddow asks an Alaska mayor about Palin
Rachel interviews Bob Weinstein, mayor of Ketchikan, Alaska, on of the towns linked to by the so-called Bridge to Nowhere. He tells the truth about Sarah Palin's flip flop on the bridge
- September 1, 2008








NYC TRMS TeeVee Machine premiere viewing par-tay - FINAL PLANS
If you're in/around NYC, come and celebrate the good doctor's spanking new show.
Monday, Sept. 8
Festivities begin at 8:00pm, continue until ??
Jake's Saloon
202 9th Ave. (b/t 22 and 23 Sts.) - there are two other Jake's locations, this one's the newest of the three
212-366-5110
I've got omazingo and possibly Passing Shot in for the festivities. If anyone else is game, give a holler here to let me know. Jake's has requested a rough head count.
When you get to Jake's, you can find us any of the following ways:
(a) ask for The Rachel Maddow Show party and/or chemgirl
(b) look for me: short, brown hair, 5'4", dressed in "professor clothes" (i.e., blue oxford shirt, khakis)
(c) look for my friends: other people in professor clothes
(d) look for Rachel's head on a big-arse 52" plasma screen TV - although you may see Keith's big head if you arrive b/t 8-9pm; we'll probably be the only people not tuned to Monday Night Football
- Email this page
By chemgirlSeptember 1, 2008 - 7:54pmOhmygod
You've already planned your wardrobe! That's so cute. (Really, no snark here -- that's just freakin' adorable, Chemgirl.)
- Email this page
By essicSeptember 1, 2008 - 9:57pmRe: clothes
It's pretty easy to predict my attire once the academic year starts: khakis/button-down shirt (always neatly pressed) on days I teach, jeans/t-shirt/sneakers on days I don't. Today I'm wearing jeans/t-shirt, ergo no class. Monday, however, I'm teaching lab all afternoon; hence, khaki/oxford shirt combo. I'll shed my labcoat and goggles before heading to the bar, though.
:cheese:
- Email this page
By chemgirlSeptember 2, 2008 - 7:26amWill...
...Kent/Jeff Jones be there????????
(Oh please oh please oh please...)
"If you want a picture of the future of Man, it is a boot in a human face--forever."--George Orwell
- Email this page
By capn_crustySeptember 1, 2008 - 10:39pmNo word on an appearance by Jeff
Fingers crossed, though.
- Email this page
By chemgirlSeptember 2, 2008 - 7:21amNYC TRMS TV Machine Premiere par-tay
I'll be there. I'll let you decide whether or not my head is rough enough to count.
- Email this page
By NJSharonSeptember 1, 2008 - 11:18pmExcellent
Rough head, and all. We probably should meet at the bar/restaurant. I'll be coming from campus with some friends.
- Email this page
By chemgirlSeptember 2, 2008 - 7:20amNJS
I was out of town for a while there.
Happy birthday! And many more.
- Email this page
By essicSeptember 2, 2008 - 7:57amoh, awesome!
You apparently look just like me! Must be a SAB thing.
- Email this page
By boltgirlSeptember 2, 2008 - 9:53amFull Length Video Podcast of New MSNBC Show
I'm writing to re-iterate my plea for a full length video podcast of Rachel's new show, just like they make for Countdown.
Please Respond with your support!!!!!!!
- Email this page
By tbsmithSeptember 1, 2008 - 10:38pmPalin's Judgment is the ISSUE when her water leaked w/Trigg
I am more interested in how McCain’s VP choice, Gov. Sarah Palin, makes decisions. I am interested in Sara Palin’s JUDGMENT. Especially since I do NOT know her, I can only assess the decisions that she has made affecting her life. Accepting her official story that Trigg is her son and not her grandson, surprising her co-workers of her pregnancy, I have questions that are not being addressed by or glossed over the TV media. THE REAL ISSUE: Why did Sarah decide to take so long to see a doctor when her water started leaking? That was risky, dangerous for both her and her child. Why take the risk? What kind of risk will she take as commander in chief? What kind of risk will she take with my life and the lives of the American people?
(http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/30/121350/137/486/580223)
On Friday, April 18th, 2008, Sarah and her husband Todd were in Dallas, Texas for a Republican Governor's Convention. They had been in town for three days already, but Sarah had yet to give her keynote speaker address on energy policy. Then early Friday morning at 4:00am, Sarah began leaking amniotic fluid. Instead of checking into a hospital, she instead made a call to her doctor, and delivered the keynote speech.
"I was not going to miss that speech," she says.
She rushed so quickly from the podium afterwards that Texas Gov. Rick Perry nervously asked if she was about to deliver the baby then.
The oddities only grow from here on, as instead of rushing to a Dallas medical facility that could treat a mother who's amniotic fluid has been draining for hours on end (made even more crucial due to the fact that this is occurring a full month prematurely), Sarah & Todd instead opted to... Fly all the way back from Texas to Alaska. A dangerous choice, as with each pregnancy (once again, in this case after four previous), a mother's window of labor to delivery grows shorter and shorter.
Aboard Alaska Airlines, the flight lasted for eight hours, with an additional landing in Seattle. The majority of commercial airlines require mothers seven months pregnant to provide a doctor's letter to fly, but Sarah did not inform the airline of her condition. Alaska Airlines is one of the few airlines that do not require such a notice, despite the possibility of an emergency landings being required in such scenarios.
… Eight months pregnant. A 6.2 pound fetus. No one notices a visible trace. By the third trimester, a perfectly fit woman not wearing anything less than a space suit should be easily spotted as pregnant. Not in Sarah's case.
The plane then made a landing in Anchorage, Alaska. Does Sarah then visit a medical facility that can accommodate a premature birth in Alaska's most equipped city? No. She drives 45 minutes away, to Mat-Su Regional Medical Center, right outside the small village she used to govern as Mayor, Wasilla. Trig Palin is then delivered one month premature, Friday night. Sarah returned to work after three days.
The inherent need to absolutely have Trig delivered in a remote and possibly ill-equipped facility for premature deliveries, where Sarah would likely have numerous contacts and pull, does not sit well. The doctor, Cathy Baldwin-Johnson, approving of all of these actions borders on malpractice. Not treating leaking amniotic fluid causes infections, and time is of the essence after water breaks.
What the heck?
(http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/31/145838/319/386/581332)
the revelation that after landing in Anchorage, Sarah drove past both Providence and Anchorage Regional, facilities ideal for premature deliveries, as both are equipped with neonatal intensive care units (NCIU). The doctor who supposedly approved of Sarah taking such risks, and later delivered Trig? Cathy Baldwin-Johnson, who has since been scrubbed from the Mt-Su Regional Medical Center website.
- Email this page
By wpoohSeptember 1, 2008 - 10:58pmJudgement
Thank you for bringing this up. It seems that discussing these things labels us as sexist but I am discussing this as a female and a mother. This discussion has nothing to do with sexism but has everything to do with judgement.
This concerns me. I can't believe that a person who had delivered four children would think that she should give a speech and then fly home to Alaska to deliver after her water broke. That is the worst decision she could have made for herself and for the child. If this is how she makes decisions, she is seriously lacking in common sense.
Did this doctor truly approve of this? If so, I hope that the AMA is looking into her judgement and her ability to practice. I can not believe that a physician would approve of this.
Sarah Palin's judgement in selecting a physician is even more indicative of her poor judgement.
- Email this page
By TexasOFDSeptember 3, 2008 - 8:56amDr.Johnson
Is this Dr.Johnson the mother of the Levi Johnson that knocked up the daughter of Sarah Palen?
- Email this page
By pyropoolSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:36ampyropool, ahemmm
The term "knocked up" is extremely insulting to women in general, so if you want to make a specific point, it may be best if you REphrase your point/question.
- Email this page
By Polly Tics (not verified)September 2, 2008 - 8:09amreally guys?
It's an interesting and potentially insightful theory about the possibility of Mrs. Palin's son being not her son and instead her grandson, and I'm sure took a bit of web sleuthing on your part, and it may be even correct! But with all do respect, who cares.
If you are gong to look at this woman and try to find fault with her by saying that she has taken her daughter's severely handicapped son into her own care and try to find fault with that, I think perhaps you should join the Pat Robertson blog site... if there is one... (assuming those people even know how to use computers).
In a sudden twist of reality, on this matter I agree with Obama's statement, and strongly second it, leave the children out of it.
If you actually think that a woman potentially taking care of a child that is not hers is in any way a bad thing, then you've been living on the Upper West Side too long and need to turn on Jerry Springer for a minute and remember what country you live in.
Besides, Sarah Palin, (aside from rising from nowhere-dom and now being euphemistically called, to my unsurprising disbelief, a VPILF on the web... think MILF with a Veep), has so many greater 'problems', that one of the left leaning species might want to try, however hopelessly, to focus their ever so divided attention on some of the more obvious ones, instead of actually potentially bringing about a story that in the end will only endear her to the only people who will like her anyway. Speaking Biblically, picture specs and logs in thy brothers eyes and apply that to her life.
What, of my own personally (unimportant) pet peeve, bothers me is that the cult of personality that is American Politics has stumped to an even greater low. It was like 2 days ago that no one even knew who she was, and now she's standing there shaking ferverently shaking grasping hands like Eddie Van Halen after a rock concert at a Van Hagar re-union tour.
How are these dumb-asses now so enthralled with her? She's the new true Paris Hilton of National politics, and I'm not sure that's a bad thing for the GOP? If she beats up on Biden in the debates, which is already being framed as her just simply showing up, than Obama is in a bit of trouble. The media can sing the 'girl beats up a boy' song all the way to the election... There's nothing like watching clips of an emasculated, once was tough guy, to show the right that once again, ‘skinny’ Obama and his white errand boy can't hold their own in a bar fight against a half cocked old man and his crossed eyed All American Mommy doll.
As for McCain’s decision to add her to the ticket, all I can say is that there is only two things at play here, either John McCain is trying to win an election, or he's trying to loose one. Either way it's bad.
- Email this page
By IdenilSeptember 2, 2008 - 4:50amIdenil, it's time to pick bones...
.
"If you actually think that a woman potentially taking care of a child that is not hers is in any way a bad thing, then you've been living on the Upper West Side too long..."
===============================================================
I must say that I find your reference to those living on the Upper West side (presumably in Manhattan) as some kind of super liberal who doesn't give a crap about taking care of kids OR "severely handicapped" children, then you might be the one who needs a reality check. Your obvious bias in all things New York OR "Liberal" seems to be a bit shaky at the moment not to mention incredibly insulting.
Now I didn't hear this specific program so I do know what was actually said, but I'm willing guess that I know the gist of it all. My hunch is that they were discussing the hypocrisy of a staunch opponent to abortion, sex ed and contraception who focuses strictly on Abstinence having a SECRET pregnant teenager. It's the hypocrisy of it all that drives most people to decry this type of action. Is that the only thing that is wrong with Sarah Palin's candidacy? Heck no, but it is PART of the overall puzzle.
Governor Palin's candidacy has many weaknesses; specifically her lack of any kind of appropriate experience to run the worlds most prominent country coupled with an extremely Right wing belief system thus leading many to question her judgment in such a tenuous time. And please spare us the she has more executive experience than Barack. That OLD spin from the GOP talking points is tired already and it's just been 2 days in the making! The idea that she has Foreign Policy experience because her state is close to Russia just doesn't even get out the basement. There is so much more, but space is limited and I am old and tired.
So is she a formidable candidate? Absolutely, but for many reasons not even being discussed. The GOP are planning to call SEXISM at first blush and they may not even wait that long. This entire debate is going to be interesting and her inclusion onto the ticket will end up being either the singularly best thing the Republicans have done (to get ELECTED) or the worst VP decision in history (I'm voting for worst). However, only time will answer that question...
- Email this page
By Polly Tics (not verified)September 2, 2008 - 12:49pmPolly Tics
You never finished your first thought so I never got to know just how you 'find' my reference....
However, you are completely incorrect in your assumption of my politics. Nowhere in my Blog is there any assertion of any bias against ‘all things New York’ as you put it. As a matter of fact, If I assume that you are a liberal and an Obama supporter, I am only seconding his very stance regarding turning peoples children into political fodder.
Not once in my blog did I offer either a condemnation of, or support of Miss Palin, and I believe if you would've read my entire posting and also some of the pertinent posts to which I was responding (as you self admittedly didn’t), you would see that I stated that there were many legitimate issues to be taken up with her.
It’s Barak Obama himself who stresses that he wants ‘high minded debates’ and to ‘change’ politics. So why do you get so upset when I point out my own feelings that the one time the so called 'Left' wing media decides to pull it’s balls out of it’s own scardy cat ass and actually pounce on something, they decide to attack the one thing that is neither an issue of governance, nor a policy discussion and couldn’t be farther from it.
This election like all elections is fundamentally already decided, and it doesn’t make a shred of difference to me who wins, other than if Senator Obama wins I won’t personally have to listen to the annoying voice dumb and dumberer repeatedly for 4 years on the news, which will be refreshing at least i suppose.
I don’t believe that there will be any real change in either case.
I am not a Dem or a GOP or any other affiliate. I am I suppose an Independent, who has actually lived in NYC, Upper West Side even! Who has spent much of her life working towards justice advocacy issues and has taken corporations to court for human rights violations and consumer issues.
I have made a successful living in the arts and continue to do so, so where I ask you, in any part of my Blog so you get the idea that I am some kind of Rust Hack or wanna be Neocon??? Is it simply because, even though I don’t agree with Gov palin’s Politics, that I can’t say that I don’t think it’s fair to attack her for trying to do what she thinks is right regarding 'her' special needs child without drawing fie from the Liberal Gestpo!
Are you so polarized, just like the Republicans that you appear to like to so fervently to bash, that you assume that ‘anyone who isn’t with you is against you? ... I know of another political figure who took this stance!
And even if I was what do you think any 'self respecting' conservative would be doing Blogging on Rachael’s site anyway, I’m not sure most of them even know how to use the interwebs anyway???
The only Bias I have about NYC is that it’s too polluted, crowded, and for me as I got older did't seem like the kind of plac nature intended humans to live in… I've had a lot of fun there in he 80’s and 90’s… when I use to like working all the time just to pay the bills and gasping for oxygen in the summer, back then it was great! Nice place to visit... as the saying goes.
I think liberalism is a funny word who’s meaning has been lost in the sea of choice ‘A’ or choice ‘B’ politics which consumes America today. It’s like our concept of freedom, you are free to drink Pepsi or Coke, free to choose between McDonald’s or Burger King.
They are both poisonous low nutrient carcinogenic death foods that only satiate the most coarse taste buds and will only make you feel bad in the end if not even send you to the cardio ward!
If you can legitimately tell me that you think that by me making a reference to the very Liberal-Centric Upper West Side makes me out of touch then I think you have bought too far into this 2 party party.
We're all being fooled, It’s like the governing of an entire nation depends entirely upon and comes down to a single issue like abortion The word itself has taken an entirely new connotation, and is now a one way ticket to a heated debate even simply for mentioning it. It's all R. V. Wade and nothing else matters.
To be honest, I don’t really care much about that issue. I’m not a ‘Pro Lifer’ (though I don't much care for death so by definition i guess you could say I am Pro Life), I’m not anti abortion because I suppose that some one if they wanted to could have an abortion, but the truth is that I really don’t care! I really don’t!
I’m not going to have kids and never will by choice. What does that make me??? What confines would you place my ideology then? Neither Pro life nor Pro Choice... let's make up a new category and challenge all the issue addicts to count as high as three! Let's say I'm 'Pro I think we're all arguing our way into consumer based self enslavement and let's face the real problems'.
There are more than enough people who care about that issue anyway, way too much, and while most dumb asses sit and argue with the religious right about late term this and stem cell that, we're all equally getting completely screwed with our pants on.
It’s a very old, very simple and very affective means to destroying an opponent. Divide and conquer.
I’ve wasted enough of my life being involved in the minutia, can a girl just say something without being labeled red or Blue?
- Email this page
By IdenilSeptember 3, 2008 - 7:07amIdenil, Perhaps I need to restate
1. My "thoughts" on your reference to how you view the Upper West Side" folks is that your obscured views about this particular group of people is wrong, insulting and shows your own venom (and bias) against anyone with a differing view. I thought my post stated that fairly clearly, so your lack of understanding here is concerning. To ascribe such a denigrating attitude AND action to ANY group of people takes nerve, and to target that particular group shows prejudice. I don't know, perhaps you had a bad bagel one morning and decided "these people" were all against you?
2. And then when you said "I am only seconding his very stance regarding turning peoples children into political fodder.", to which I must say "good". What's the issue there? However, I will tell you what concerns me about the choice of Palin is the obscurity and very definite POLITICAL nature in choosing her, someone whom none of us know and someone who just may (providing McCain wins) be in charge of running the United States of America. The choice, as Karl Rove stated, was not a GOVERNING choice, but a CAMPAIGN (ie: Political) choice. And THAT is where McCain's assertion that he values Country first over Party is shown to be simply ludicrous.
Obama has never ONCE offered up that the children or family of a candidate is political fodder, THAT WAS KARL ROVE (the Republican). As a matter of fact, Obama has continued to state the opposite, stressing that he refuses to tolerate ANYONE who uses family in order to boost some sort of political goal.
3. I find your tirade above to be a mix of accusations and facts about your personal life which I find odd, particularly since I posted a polite response to your first comments and questions. Yes, I was offended by your Upper West Side Liberal comment and no I am not an Upper West Side Liberal, but I have known, befriended, worked for, employed and dated many. The rest of my response was a polite and direct commentary as to the topic you were addressing. I have nothing further to say to your somewhat snide response to me, so I will let it lay. I prefer a civil debate with ad hominens left for the Pat Buchanan blogs to which you refer.
4. And finally, you ask "can a girl just say something without being labeled red or Blue?" to which I answer "of course".
- Email this page
By Polly Tics (not verified)September 3, 2008 - 2:56pmEveryone must go listen/watch P-Diddys take on Sarah Pale- Eh-Em
lol omg...a bit stupid but also priceless ( the uneducated(???) black American commenting on the 'no black people' in Alaska, etc...) Reminds me of the time ten years ago in San Fran, when a young black American asked me if Canada had any black people. I was like?!!! What, ...just let me quote part of a GREEN DAY song, "I don't want to be an American Idiot..."...everyone can sing along.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thmueS0ngAs
Diddy Blog...ouch.
ps. there are idiot white people, yellow people, purple people...but, when sucessful people like DIDDY post on youtube, with actual power behind him, he should do a tiny tiny bit of fact checking. Not expecting him to be a Rhodes Scholar, but he does ask young people to vote, and with his power and popularity he owes Alaska a bit of respect, at least do a google one off search dude. He also owes himself a bit of respect. For example, if I posted an opinion about Irish people on youtube in a political international context, I would have at the verrrrrrrrrrrrry least checked my facts.
His blog is funny, correct and incorrect. Which unfortunately makes it stoopid.
oh ya in Oklahoma once, a white American asked me if I spoke CANADIAN.
mmmmmmmmmm............ I have yet to meet an Italian, French or Spanish person ask me either of those questions.
There is something wrong with the water there right?! In the USA, that is.
- Email this page
By wildwolfgurlSeptember 2, 2008 - 11:21amJake's in Rio
Sure wish I could come to the party - if you're ever in Rio de Janeiro I have a bead on a number of local dives sure to please. How is your appreciation of cachaça? A few caipirinhas and it's all smiles.
Put me down for the full video podcast.
Congratulations again.
jim
- Email this page
By jimeluizSeptember 2, 2008 - 8:41amI hope there is a full video
I hope there is a full video podcast too! I live in Ireland so it's the only way I could see it!
Also, I'm not sure if there is a name for the show yet... but my suggestion...
NewsCrunch! (with Rachel Maddow)
- Email this page
By emmettSeptember 2, 2008 - 9:38amI still think we should call it...
Eric.
What? It's a nice name.
"If you want a picture of the future of Man, it is a boot in a human face--forever."--George Orwell
- Email this page
By capn_crustySeptember 2, 2008 - 9:49amMSNBC has begun advertising
MSNBC has begun advertising the show as THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW last time I looked.
All of the colorful, apt and oh so clever names for the show that we came up with is moot. I hate moot, moot is no fun...
- Email this page
By Polly Tics (not verified)September 2, 2008 - 10:02amGlad to know Sarah Palin is Pro-Choice
Here's a letter to the editor of the Boulder (CO) Daily Camera that I submitted today. If Sarah Palin ISN'T pro-choice, and doesn't want other women to have the same choice as her daughter Bristol, she's worse than incompetent.
Dear Editor: Although I am still a staunch supporter of the Obama/Biden ticket, I am thrilled to learn that John McCain's running mate, Sarah Palin is pro-choice. I base this assumption on the (I'm sure carefully worded) statement from the Palin family regarding their daughter's pregnancy. In it Sarah and her family say, "We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents." The word "decision" certainly implies that there was a choice for young Bristol, and I'm hopeful the Republican choice for VP voices her support for every woman's right to make their own decision when faced with a pregnancy. I will look forward to hearing more about this pro-choice stance as the campaign rolls forward. Bravo for Sarah Palin for standing up for a women's right to choose.
- Email this page
By Gager35September 2, 2008 - 11:02amDoes Bristol or Boyfriend really have a choice??? I'm Now Ex Rep
Hi Gager35, this is my first time posting. I must preface by saying that I am currently a registered republican mother of two; age 40. After Obama's speech, I was seriously considering jumping to the Independant party but now After the Palin nomination I am definitely switching. I can no longer live with myself and call myself a Republican after this. As a woman I am extremly offended by her nomination, the apparent lack of veetting and quite honestly of the Republican's acting like they have all the correct moral answers. What I wonder the most is, what would happen if this young lady did not want to have this child? What of the young father and his family and future??? This party (The Republicans) are turning into a scary bunch of folks. I feel like Paul of the Bible who's scales fell off off his eyes as he came into the knowledge of The Truth. I do consider myself conservative on many issues; however I think back to Katrina 3 years ago and see Bush & Mccain smiling over that cake as $1,600 people (many of them children) lost their lives in a terrible way. I do not agree with abortion as a form of birth control which I personally know some women use; however I do think that a female person should have the right to decide her own destiny and live with the consequences whatever they are. It seems to me that all others are making the decisions for these young peoples lives just to save face. One more thing, this ludicris notion that Palin's family situation is off limits just burns my grits!!! If Obama's unmarried daughter were pregnant, this would have a whole different spin. I have been watching Fox & also listening to the conservative radio shows and the hate and blatent racisim has really turned my stomach. I so regret my votes for Pres. Bush and I refuse to make the same mistake twice. I'm with Hilary on this, No way, No how, No McCain-Palin.
- Email this page
By Repnomore68September 2, 2008 - 11:25amWelcome Repnomore68!
It's awfully nice to hear from folks who have been reading this blog but just not posting. I am an Obama supporter as well, but my parents and every known relative are staunch Republicans (yes, I was always the black sheep of the family) and I have heard similar stories from some of them. What has happened to the Republican party is so disturbing from a policy, legal and personal point of view that it now has been deformed into something totally new...and not in a good way.
I really do appreciate hearing your story and do hope you will continue to post here with us. Welcome aboard Repnomore68, we only have 2 more months until Election Day!
- Email this page
By Polly Tics (not verified)September 2, 2008 - 2:54pmGlad to know Sarah Palin is Pro-Choice
I'm so glad you paid close attention to their wording. You made a great point and I'm glad you made this posting.
Thanks
- Email this page
By vikkidsSeptember 2, 2008 - 9:40pmWhere's the Green 960 podcast this morning?
I'm having horrible visions of some contracting agreement hitting yesterday that keeps them from putting up the free, reliable podcasts, and, as established before, my office is a regrettably bourbon-free zone, so it's not shaping up to be nearly the day I had hoped for. Jesus, look at what's happening to my sentence construction already!
- Email this page
By boltgirlSeptember 2, 2008 - 11:18amAnxiously awaiting release
I definitely had a bit of a panic this morning when I could not load the podcast before my morning commute. Keep us posted.
- Email this page
By jimeluizSeptember 2, 2008 - 11:26ami feel so bad for bristol
i feel so bad for bristol palin. she's 17 and suddenly thrust into the chaos of a national election.
HOWEVER - and don't give me any of this oh, what kind of a feminist are you? crap -
if sarah palin cared more about her family than about politics, she NEVER would have risked subjecting her daughter to that kind of public humiliation and scrutiny. i'm a mom. not for one second would i do that to my kids. unfortunately, partisan politics have made any discussion of work/family issues now completely untouchable or the republicans will start screaming 'no fair! no fair!' just as they've been screaming 'no fair! no fair!' every time the first black nominee for president in american history tries to discuss issues of race.
if barack obama had a 17 year old daughter and it was discovered that she was 5 months pregnant, what do you think karl rove (who opened the convention by calling joe biden a 'big blowhard doofus') would be directing the mccain campaign to say about it? what do you think rush limbaugh would be saying about it? (remember how that caring and sensitive republican referred to 12 year old chelsea clinton as 'the white house dog'?)
the hypocrisy is so thick you could smear it on larry craig's minnesota airport bathroom wall with a spackle knife .
- Email this page
By franland13September 2, 2008 - 12:04pmSara Palin's 17 Year Old Sacrifice
Are John McCain, Sara Palin and the Republicans are so desperate to win the White House that are now willing to sacrifice Palin’s her 17 years old pregnant daughter for the Republican party? If what John McCain says is true that he and his team knew of the five month pregnancy of Sara Palin’s daughter and that it didn’t matter to them then that should be a chilling thought to all Americans. John McCain has shown that he is willing to put a 17 years old child and her unborn baby front a center of is campaign to win the White House. Sara Palin has shown that she is willing to sacrifice her daughter at the expense of her family and her daughter’s boy friends emotional well being. Using this girl as a badge of honor for the Republicans is about the lowest thing I have ever heard of. It is despicable. John McCain, Sara Palin, her husband and the Republican party should be ashamed of themselves. I now know what they think of my son and daughter.
It is hard enough being a teenager today. There aren’t many things harder than being teenager while pregnant. I have a 15 year old daughter and I could never ask her to put herself in the national spotlight if she were pregnant so I could win the White House. During the last trimester of the daughters pregnancy her mother will be on the campaign trail preaching family values when she should be at home showing family values. In 3-4 months when the baby arrives were will 17 year old daughters mother be? At the Learning Annex taking a crash course in foreign affairs? This girl will an emotional wreck. I’m not even mentioning the intense scrutiny of Palin’s other kids will now get over this – Wow!
Sara Palin already has a four month down syndrome baby and now her 17 year old is having a baby and she has stated that she doesn’t even know the job requirements for the Vice President’s office and she still wants to be VP? Are you kidding me? Sara Palin’s emotional state should be questioned. Obliviously her career is more important than her family. This is new face of the Republican party? The Republican’s new face of America? Ambition over family - the Republican ticket.
I am stunned.
Nick Catran-Whitney
Woodland Hills , CA
- Email this page
By DSLKeeperSeptember 2, 2008 - 12:35pmSarah Palin's Grandchild
Who will pay for the birth of Sarah Palin’s grandchild?
At the age of 17, the child’s mother most likely is a dependent covered under Governor Palin’s group medical insurance or her husband’s group medical insurance. Does the Governor’s or her husband’s group medical policy cover the birth of a dependent of a dependent? Can someone please check? Will Governor Palin’s pregnant daughter and the child’s father get married before the birth? If they do, then the young daughter no longer is anyone’s dependent. Does the baby’s father have a job with group medical insurance that will cover the birth of the child? No? Can the expectant parents buy an individual insurance policy in the State of Alaska? Bet not. The wife is already pregnant! So, if Sarah Palin’s daughter and her significant other get married prior to the birth of their child, she and her husband may qualify for Medicaid. Otherwise, Governor Palin’s daughter should wait until the baby is born before she gets married, so the taxpayers of the State of Alaska can foot the bill for the birth of the blessed event. Any unbiased reporter in conjunction with a really savvy medical insurance expert should investigate and alert the public! Is it possible that President Obama could have universal health care in place prior to the blessed event? Guess not. These kids are just SOL, unless the grandparents-to-be get together and hold a fundraiser! ….and these are the people who brought us family values and demand abstinence-only sex education in our public schools.
Now it is being reporter the Governor herself was pregnant when she and her husband eloped; their first was born eight months after the marriage. Like mother, like daughter
- Email this page
By annmcenerySeptember 7, 2008 - 12:48pmnot the same as Denver, is it?
angrrygrrl wants to know if Rachel will bring up the unbelievable mistreatment of protesters and (non Republican) press journalists during the RNC. A
- Email this page
By AngrrygrrlSeptember 2, 2008 - 2:47pmIt's a mixed bag.
The first reports I read sounded like the protesters were being mistreated. People were being arrested in their homes before the convention even started.
Now I'm not so sure. These folks have been throwing rocks at windows and blocking off streets. They're not just making noise for people at the convention, they're causing serious trouble for regular people just trying to drive through the area.
I'm for allowing protests, but the police have to do something when the protesters get violent.
Have there been reports of police doing anything really bad to the protesters?
- Email this page
By Jason M. BryantSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:16pmWhat a Convention...
The media is doing a terrible job at covering the protesters at the Republican Convention. Yes some had bad intentions, but those were some groups who declared anarchy (or so I read), BUT there are some legitimate and peaceful protesters that have been treated in a violent manner. It is shameful behavior and the press isn't going near this thing. My bet is that AFTER the event is over, it will be revealed how badly things went and perhaps at that time the press will be castigated.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-dantoni/amy-goodman-violently-arr_b_12...
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/democracy_now_host...
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/donna_brazile_hit_...
- Email this page
By Polly Tics (not verified)September 2, 2008 - 4:00pmBig Voiced Movie Guy dies
Don LaFontaine
http://www.kval.com/news/entertainment/27770824.html
"If you want a picture of the future of Man, it is a boot in a human face--forever."--George Orwell
- Email this page
By capn_crustySeptember 2, 2008 - 2:50pmOle Phil Gramm is Backkkk
---OT---
Lookie, lookie, it seems that ole Phil Gramm has put his foot in his big mouth one more time. Just today he revisited his infamous slur against all American's suffering from a bad economy.
Today at a Financial Services Roundtable in Minneapolis, Phillie boy said "If you're sitting here today, you're not economically illiterate and you're not a whiner, so I'm not worried about who you're going to vote for,''
What I want to know is why he thinks that anyone who is not voting for McCain is not merely a whiner, but is now also economically illiterate? You mean if you are losing your home or are suffering from a wretched economy you are a crybaby idiot? Do they ever learn? Well let us just hope that the Dem's take this and hang them high with their own words!
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aMKGayf6JoDc&refer=h...
- Email this page
By Polly Tics (not verified)September 2, 2008 - 3:04pmPaul, Ron
Sarah gushed to MTV how cool Ron Paul was?
Ron Paul is having a "celebrity" event this week, in MSP? As Dr. Maddow would say with the Scooby sound effect-- "really"?
Any chance that McCain's choice was a way to slow the defection of Ron Paul sympathizers from his base? (it isn't mutually exclusive that she also shores up the successionist base, the pentecostals, Monica Goodling, divorce drama, dwai, McCarthy loyalty pledge, Jamie Lynn Spear, lawyered up corruption targets bases as well.)
Good idea for the Dems to let this pot stew for awhile... although it is surely stepping on Ron Paul's conventionn bounce.
- Email this page
By NicoloMSeptember 2, 2008 - 3:46pmNicoloM - That's Not How a Libertarian's Mind Works
Palin may look like a "reformer" at a quick glance (though it's becoming clear that her "reforming" image has a LOT of smudges on it), but she's still a Religious Right Social Conservative - and that is anathema to Paul's base, which is straight-line Libertarian Conservative. All those Internet Geeks who are Paypaling donations into Ron Paul's coffers fancy themselves the heirs to Ayn Rand, so they have zero truck w/the messianic religioso mysticism and theocratic social control of the current Republican Party - who are precisely the kind of people McCain's hoping to bring back by choosing Palin as his running mate.
As to why Rachel might fangirl over Ron Paul? Well, he is a Libertarian who believes the Government must never stick its nose in people's personal choices (including sexual preferences), after all. Moreover, he's been adamantly against the Police Stating of America, when even supposed "Constitutionalists" like Arlen Specter and Barack Obama have folded like cheap suits in the face of the Traitors Bush/Cheney/Gonzalez waving their Osama bin Laden handpuppets menacingly at them.
Come right down to it - as a former member of the Libertarian Party, I think rather well of Ron Paul myself in a lot of ways. I wouldn't vote for him b/c I think he puts too much blind faith in the Free Market, even though it's clear that the first thing the Free Market does is lock things up so it's no longer free at all - but if he were by some miracle the Republican Presidential Candidate I wouldn't feel the same sinking sense of horror I feel with the Rove-Palin - I mean, McCain-Palin ticket....
- Email this page
By drdarkenySeptember 4, 2008 - 12:47pmUsing Google's "Chrome" for the first time
Seems to load pretty quickly. We'll see how other issues go.
"If you want a picture of the future of Man, it is a boot in a human face--forever."--George Orwell
- Email this page
By capn_crustySeptember 3, 2008 - 2:12pmChrome Review
http://www.kval.com/news/tech/27822289.html
The reviewer recommends Gates' latest. Otherwise, he gives Chrome a little more cred than Firefox. Since I refuse to use Microsoft unless absolutely necessary (Damn you, Netflix Insta-watch!), I'll still be giving Chrome an honest try-out.
Gates already has too much money.
"If you want a picture of the future of Man, it is a boot in a human face--forever."--George Orwell
- Email this page
By capn_crustySeptember 3, 2008 - 4:07pmSounds like I should quit the Firefox
But I like it, even if it does turn my computer into a sloth.
- Email this page
By chemgirlSeptember 3, 2008 - 4:30pmHow's that...
...for cross-posting? lol
"If you want a picture of the future of Man, it is a boot in a human face--forever."--George Orwell
- Email this page
By capn_crustySeptember 3, 2008 - 4:37pmTry Running FF3
Sluggishness was my biggest complaint w/FF2, Chemgirl - but FF3's a lot peppier....
I'm holding off on Google Chrome for a bit, until they work some of the bugs out - whatever those bugs may be, they're always there somehow.
- Email this page
By drdarkenySeptember 4, 2008 - 11:51amWell, that was quick
When I went to a chatroom that uses Java, the display said "Java not installed"...even though it is. So I reinstalled it, just in case, then even went so far as to reboot the whole machine. Nada.
Not only that, but the browser sometimes just vanishes if one clicks the "back" button or "reload", or just looks at it cross-ways.
Back to Firefox for me.
"If you want a picture of the future of Man, it is a boot in a human face--forever."--George Orwell
- Email this page
By capn_crustySeptember 3, 2008 - 4:32pmYa know, that is
Probably the best choice (for the time being). Wait until they refine the software and then give it a test drive again.
I have found it best to stay put until certain software is tested and reviewed by those I trust, then try it out. I have cooked my puter a few times trying out new software, so I am more than a bit cynical.
- Email this page
By Polly Tics (not verified)September 3, 2008 - 4:45pmURGENT - Sarah Palin and Book Banning
It was reported today in NYT that shortly after becoming mayor, former city officials and Wasilla residents said, Ms. Palin approached the town librarian about the possibility of banning some books, though she never followed through and it was unclear which books or passages were in question.
Ann Kilkenny, a Democrat who said she attended every City Council meeting in Ms. Palin’s first year in office, said Ms. Palin brought up the idea of banning some books at one meeting. “They were somehow morally or socially objectionable to her,” Ms. Kilkenny said.
The librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, pledged to “resist all efforts at censorship,” Ms. Kilkenny recalled. Ms. Palin fired Ms. Emmons shortly after taking office but changed course after residents made a strong show of support.
- Email this page
By murphyegSeptember 3, 2008 - 5:33pmSarah Palin
Throughout my entire life, liberals have been bashing conservatives for their decision-making. If only your hollow, clueless, ignorant brains were as transparent as your words. Go ahead. We'll be smiling as we listen to all of you whine, no doubt, for yet another four years.
- Email this page
By anniethe badbad...September 3, 2008 - 6:33pmThe End of the Fourth Estate
THE NEGLECTED STORY - an election in perspective
The neglected story and the most important story is the loss of the fourth estate in American politic. The republicans attack on the so-called liberal media performing biased reporting has dire consequences.
I believe the heads of the news media must come together for a press conference, if they agree with me.
The current republican contradictions and the attack on the media lump all media together. The republican campaign has the nuance and the wherewithal to understand the difference between news media and tabloid, fact and fiction, truth and un-truth. We recognize cultural differences and perspectives. However, the republican contradictions and claims of unfair treatment use these cultural differences and perspectives to explain away their unreasonable disagreement with evident facts and truths.
The behavior by the republican party will ultimately erode and perhaps eliminate the role of a free press in American society. By not distinguishing between serious news reporting and tabloid reporting they have equated all information has equal. Therefore, there is not truth or fact. There is only subjective noise. If, we sound alarmist, we are alarmed. As with a round earth, and the earth’s orbit around the sun; our claim is indisputably evident. Some calling us alarmist would demand nothing. However, we now have come together to state unequivocally the erosion and eventual death of the fourth estate from American Institutions is well under way. Action is required. Action is demanded.
As leaders in this important institution of American tradition, a guarantor of freedom, we ask the American public to demand more, to ask more, and to be more.
We believe that to continue down this destructive path to attempt to equate all information as equal must be pushed back by the republican party itself or by the American electorate.
- Email this page
By zedthewizardSeptember 4, 2008 - 11:47amnote to dems: do you know what executive experience means?
a letter to the dems from an MBA grad:
you just have no answer to McCain’s executive experience in the navy . . . ask: "what did he do?" over and over and over. I guarantee that what will eventually come will be managerial rather than executive experience. you see managerial is tactics: executive is strategy. McCain didn't deal with strategy. get a business book and Wesley Clark.
Obama has tactics experience (believe me he does), he now has a vision of a stronger America that's been weakened under republican control. it's time for a change. vision equals an executive outlook.
budgeting is managerial. their platform is basically a bunch of managerial decisions or non-integrated policy decisions that they hope will work but don't form a cohesive vision AND haven't worked in the past.
an example: they will cut taxes and borrow more from the Chinese as bush has and palin did as mayor. we need to restore fiscal balance lost under bush that will continue under McCain/palin. stability will allow robust economic growth.
-- okay, they kind of have a vision -- but you can beat them on it. their vision is too tactically driven and your vision appears too socialist for america -- hey, i'm way left of any of you privately.
nuclear reactors aren’t cheap, while your spending time and money on irrelevant drilling and far away reactors we won't get the necessary WORK done -- TIME and MONEY that could get our economy working will be lost.
you want to INVEST in the economy, healthcare, energy . . . you want to curb the excesses to get people and America working again.
the media is waiting for you to tell them what to ask and how to respond. they don't know what executive experience is either -- your all lawyers and journalists and communications people on the TV that I see. hire a business consultant that can transfer business language to your needs or read a couple of texts over two days.
didn't you get the memo from Rick Davies. you think we're rational. we're not. issues are good too, but no one's hearing you while they are ordering a bio on Amazon.
if the debate was in a week you'd be in a good place. it's not. better surrogates for the shows, specifics can defeat contradictions and talking points.
the reps would like to be dismissive of a good education, a law degree, Harvard law review, legislative experience, practicing as an attorney, helping people in need but it means something in understanding the nuances of political life, achieving goals in a legal environment, working with others which is essentially Washington BECAUSE although McCain has it, he doesn't have the TEMPERMANT or the VISION. palin doesn't have either, and she may be the president! you see it's about personalities!
and, we don't have time for McCain to fight because he likes fighting. we have to put people and America back to work.
see -- fighting -- temperament -- personalities.
Obama has a vision of putting America back to work -- an executive outlook. figure something out. CAPTURE VISION: EXECUTIVE OUTLOOK BEFORE MCCAIN REALIZES THIS: your vision is percieved as a bit of old school socialism rather than market socialism aka bill c.
attack reform. reform is a laudable goal, but we need to get people working, restore the military and our might in the world, provide stability in our financial sector to grow the economy. we need to put the engine of American ingenuity back to work. then we can tackle needed reforms. but the idea that you are going to change Washington overnight will delay what america needs to do to achieve the results we need NOW. MCCAIN LIKES FIGHTING which is great, but we don't have the time to fight and then do something. the reforms worth fighting while worthy, won't grow the economy NOW.
" . . . Barack Obama said that Palin's assaults were aimed at diverting attention from campaign issues such as the economy." --- whining
fyi -- bush isn't running. Prosecute him later over the war! you do want to win?
or you can read my other book,
democratic misunderstanding of the American people: how to lose an election.
i understand there is some sarcasm. but, you see, you don't see everything. we all have filters and blinders. I’m not saying this is it, but your starting to look like Kerry to me. it's both the economy stupid and America!
- Email this page
By zedthewizardSeptember 4, 2008 - 2:46pmList of posted RM Wathing parties
You can find it at:
http://trmslistenerswiki.wetpaint.com/
I have little details on the Austin and Seattle parties, so if anyone here happens to know more, please update the info.... all you have to do is sign up! Also, feel free to add a new one if you want to.
- Email this page
By cool_princessieSeptember 4, 2008 - 4:02pmThank